Audit and improve an article
Evaluate a saved article, explain issues by severity, and prepare revisions without silently overwriting editorial decisions.
Job to be done
Successful outcome
A content-quality result tied to the saved article, with actionable improvements and a recheck path.
Prerequisites
- The correct client is selected.
- A saved article exists in GrowthOS.
- The user has identified which article should be reviewed.
Inputs
- Saved article
- Optional quality objective or editorial constraint
Browser procedure
Numbered journey
Open the article
Find the requested saved article and verify its client, title, and latest content.
Expected: The intended article is open.
Prepare the audit
Select the content-quality action and review any displayed scope or credit information.
Expected: The requested review is ready for approval.
Request approval
Ask the user to approve the content-quality run if credits will be consumed.
Expected: The user explicitly authorizes the audit.
Run and wait
Start the review once and wait for every quality section to complete.
Expected: A complete quality result is attached to the article.
Explain the result
Summarize score, severity, affected sections, and suggested corrections.
Expected: The user understands what is deterministic, suggested, or editorial.
Apply only approved edits
Propose revisions and wait for approval before changing article content.
Expected: Editorial judgment stays with the user.
Approval boundaries
- Before a credit-consuming audit
- The user approves the displayed cost.
- Before changing article content
- The user chooses which revisions to apply.
Outputs
- Quality score and status
- Issues grouped by severity
- Affected sections
- Recommended revisions
- Recheck option
Recovery
- If results look incomplete, confirm every audit section has reached a terminal state.
- If the article changed after the audit, run a new review only with user approval.
- Preserve the original text until edits are approved.
Stop conditions and guardrails
- Never run a paid quality audit without explicit user approval.
- Never silently rewrite an article.
- Never publish as part of the quality-review journey.
- Distinguish suggestions from verified facts.
- Do not reuse a quality score for content that has changed.
Ready to delegate
Copyable agent prompt
Open GrowthOS using my authorized browser session. Find the saved article “[ARTICLE TITLE]” for the selected client and prepare a Content Quality review. Show me any cost before running it. After I approve, wait for all review sections to finish, then summarize the score, severe issues, affected sections, and recommended revisions. Do not edit or publish the article without another explicit approval.